Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in disk file site

Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type has the advantage of having a server on idc, so that it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you will need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.


Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions.  Webhard is not only a Webhard, it is a company.

It is because it really is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage and also the Webhard's original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the answer.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which is often fully built in Soho, so the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.


It is now essential for Soho to establish a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files over the Internet at a set monthly cost. This means that the use of web hard is becoming common.



But it's not just lately that this concept arrived, and it's true that it is been a long time. When it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.



The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also leads to security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company refuses to adopt it.


In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, there are functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Consequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it's a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very useful solution that's less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.


Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough top features of Webhard and guide you.  다시보기 It is possible to go over it and choose the best one based on the reality and needs.